Local churches are authorized to provide for the preaching of the gospel (continued)

Overview of the New Testament passages (continued)

  • Philippians 1:3-5; 4:14-18 - “participation in the gospel”
  • I Thessalonians 1:6-10 - “sounded forth from you”
    • I Thessalonians 2:2, 14
    • II Thessalonians 1:4
    • This was a brand new church, but they were already spreading the word and had a reputation for doing so.

Observation: The money was sent directly to the preacher.

  • Antioch ➡️ Paul and Barnabas (Acts 15:3?)
  • Corinth ➡️ Paul (I Corinthians 9:1-18)
  • Philippi ➡️ Paul (Philippians 4:14-18)
  • II Corinthians 11:7-9 - multiple churches sent directly to Paul
  • We never see a “sponsoring church” in the New Testament.
  • Benchley sends money directly to preachers, giving us direct communication and oversight.

Objection: We need something more.

  • First, whether we ever understand WHY God limited work to a congregational level instead of a multi-congregational level, that’s as far as the authority goes.
  • Second, God’s congregational method works wonderfully!
  • Example:
    • Initially, elders were over their own congregation, as directed in the New Testament.
    • Over time, one elder became chief elder, then one elder gained power over more churches, finally resulting in the Pope.
    • At what point did this become wrong?
    • How far back would you need to scale it back to make it right?

Sponsoring churches

  • First, there is no authority for churches to pool money together for evangelism.
    • Some argue: churches sent wages to Paul via Philippi. Philippi was a sponsoring church.
      • Philippians 4:15
      • Context: Philippians 4:15-18 - The Philippian church sent directly to Paul.
      • II Corinthians 11:8 - Which churches are these? Is this the same occasion?
  • Second, local churches - which should have independent function and local oversight - give away control of the money they send.