Mark 16:9-20

Posted by mark under Classes

By David Watson

Benchley, October 12, 2011

 

  • Mark 16:9-20 – Some argue that this section uses different words and phrases than are used elsewhere in Mark. Others criticize this as a very weak argument for the omission of these verses. Some also argue that the language does show that Mark wrote it. The majority of old manuscripts (with the exception of the Sinaiticus and Vaticanus) include these verses.
  • Mark 16:17 – This is specifically referring to the apostles, although it may also refer to those who believed and had been given spiritual gifts by the apostles. It certainly does not refer to all believers up to the present time, as we know from other passages.
  • Conclusions: points to remember
    • The Gospel of Action
      • This was written to a people under persecution. It shows why people should risk persecution to follow Jesus. Mark concentrates on the miracles of Jesus to show His power.
    • Less is more
      • Mark gives a much shorter telling of the story than the other gospels. He is brief in his writing and skips details in order to get to the main point quickly.
    • Jesus is Lord

Mark 16:1-9

Posted by mark under Classes

By David Watson

Benchley, October 5, 2011

 

  • Mark 16:9 – Accounting for Jesus being the tomb for three days:
    • Acts 10:3,9,23,24,30 – Example of time accounting in the New Testament. Cornelius counts the time as four days, but we would probably call it three days since it was roughly 72 hours. Cornelius counted the partial first and fourth days as full days.
    • II Chronicles 10:5,2 – This is another example from the Old Testament.
    • Matthew 27:63-64 – Jesus’ enemies certainly understood Jesus about time.

Mark, Part 26

Posted by mark under Classes

By David Watson

Benchley, September 14, 2011

Mark 14:66-15:28

Posted by mark under Classes

By David Watson

Benchley, September 7, 2011

 

Mark 14:37-72

Posted by mark under Classes

By David Watson

Benchley, August 31, 2011

 

Mark 14:22-36

Posted by mark under Classes

By David Watson

Benchley, August 24, 2011

 

  • Mark 14:22 – Jesus meant that the bread and fruit of the vine were memorials of His body and blood. This was a figure of speech. He did not mean that the bread and fruit of the vine literally became His body and blood.
  • Mark 14:25 – Jesus did drink of the fruit of the vine again on earth after His resurrection. “That day” shows that Jesus was pointing to a specific day when He would drink it again, which ties in with the examples we have of early Christians partaking of the Lord’s Supper on the first day of the week.
  • Mark 14:33 – See Philippians 4:6. Jesus did not violate this verse by being anxious about His impending crucifixion because the verse is stressing the importance of bringing our troubles to God. This is exactly what Jesus did by praying in the garden.
  • Mark 14:36 – In a similar way, we must deny ourselves and obey God’s will in order to be pleasing to Him. Jesus may simply be praying that the whole ordeal would pass quickly, rather than praying that He would escape it completely. He knew it was His mission to die on the cross, so it would not make sense for Him to pray against His mission.

Mark 13:33-14:21

Posted by mark under Classes

By David Watson

Benchley, August 10, 2011

 

  • Mark 13:33 – Whether or not this is talking about the end of the world, we must be on the alert. See II Peter 3:10-12.
  • Compare the order of the accounts in Mark 13, Matthew 24, and Luke 17. The order seems to imply that all of these chapters are talking about the destruction of Jerusalem.
  • Mark 14:7 – Jesus was prophesying His own death, which was coming very soon.
  • Mark 14:12 – The feast of Unleavened Bread took place for seven days once a year.

Mark 13:9-33

Posted by mark under Classes

By David Watson

Benchley, August 3, 2011

 

Mark 12:13-13

Posted by mark under Classes

By David Watson

Benchley, July 13, 2011

Mark 11:18-12:12

Posted by mark under Classes

By David Watson

Benchley, July 6, 2011